By Babak Akhlaghi on October 2, 2023. In Netflix, Inc. v. DivX, LLC, Case No. 22-1138 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 11, 2023) (Stoll, Hughes, and Stark, JJ.), the Federal Circuit held no magic word is required to determine if the prior art and the patent are […]
KNOW MOREBy Babak Akhlaghi on September 24, 2023. In Volvo Penta of the Americas, LLC v. Brunswick Corp., Case No. 22-1765 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 24, 2023) (Moore, Lourie, Cunningham, JJ.), the Federal Circuit reversed the Board’s obviousness rejection, finding that there was insufficient evidence to support […]
KNOW MOREBy Babak Akhlaghi on September 1, 2023. In a typical case involving obviousness rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the key issue often revolves around whether a prior art reference teaches a specific claim limitation or if a skilled artisan would have been motivated to […]
KNOW MOREBy Babak Akhlaghi on August 28, 20223. The Federal Circuit held that claims directed to digital data compression are not patent eligible. Realtime Data LLC v. Array Networks Inc., Case No. 2021-2251 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 2, 2023). Realtime filed suit alleging infringement of seven patents […]
KNOW MOREBy Babak Akhlaghi on August 17, 2023. A Brief Legal History: Understanding Reissue Patents Patent owners have the option to seek a broader scope of coverage for their invention by filing a continuation application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office while their original […]
KNOW MOREBy Babak Akhlaghi on August 8, 2023. The Federal Circuit reversed the Board’s non-obviousness finding, holding that the key question in obviousness determination is whether a skilled artisan would be motivated to combine different references to achieve the claimed invention not the references. Axonics, Inc. […]
KNOW MOREBy Babak Akhlaghi on July 28, 2023. The Federal Circuit upheld a decision of the district court that claims directed to poll based networking system are not patent eligible. Trinity Info Media, LLC v. Covalent, Inc., Case No. 22-1308 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2023) (Stoll, […]
KNOW MOREBy Babak Akhlaghi on July 20, 2023. The Federal Circuit upheld a decision of the district court to amend inventorship, determining that the alleged co-inventor made significant contributions to the conception of at least one claim in each contested patent. Blue Gentian, LLC v. Tristar […]
KNOW MOREIn a reversal of the district court’s decision, the Federal Circuit determined that an alleged inventor, who was not named in the patent application, did not qualify as a joint inventor. This was due to the alleged inventor’s contribution being deemed too insignificant when considered […]
KNOW MOREBy Babak Akhlaghi on July 7, 2023. Are you curious about the power of patents? In this video, we’ll explore how patent damage awards can reach jaw-dropping amounts. Take a look at the five largest patent damage awards in 2022: you won’t believe what they […]
KNOW MORE