Subscribe to our Newsletter

The Frontier of Innovation: Navigating Blockchain Patents

By Babak Akhlaghi on March 21, 2024.

In the rapidly evolving world of technology, blockchain stands out as a revolutionary force, reshaping industries with its decentralized, secure, and transparent nature. From cryptocurrency to smart contracts, and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) to Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs), blockchain technology’s applications are vast and varied. However, as with any groundbreaking innovation, protecting these inventions through patents has become a critical concern for developers and companies alike.

The Essence of Blockchain Technology

At its core, blockchain technology offers a decentralized ledger system, enabling secure and transparent transactions without the need for intermediaries. This foundational concept has given rise to various applications, including Ethereum’s smart contract platforms and Bitcoin’s cryptocurrency framework. The versatility of blockchain extends beyond financial transactions, promising significant transformations in sectors like supply chain management, healthcare, and intellectual property management.

The Role of Patents in Blockchain Innovation

The surge in blockchain technology’s popularity has been accompanied by an increased focus on securing patents for blockchain-related innovations. Patents play a pivotal role in protecting novel ideas, ensuring that inventors can reap the benefits of their inventions without fear of unauthorized use or replication. In the blockchain domain, patents cover a wide range of innovations, from the underlying algorithms and data structures to the specific applications like smart contracts and cryptocurrency mechanisms.

Challenges and Considerations in Blockchain Patenting

Patenting blockchain technology presents unique challenges, given its foundational nature and broad applicability across different sectors. The Patent Act specifies that patent-eligible subject matter includes any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, excluding laws of nature, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas. To assess patent eligibility, a two-step framework from Supreme Court cases, Mayo and Alice, is employed. In the first step, we determine if the claim is directed to a patent-ineligible concept such as an abstract idea. If so, we move to the second step to evaluate if the elements of the claim transform it into a patent-eligible application of the patent-ineligible concept.

For instance, in In PersonalWeb Techs. LLC v. Google LLC, YouTube, LLC, Case No. 20-1543 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 12, 2021), the Federal Circuit ruled that claims related to data-processing systems assigning unique identifiers to data based on content are not patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. §101. The case involved PersonalWeb Technologies suing Google LLC and others for infringing three U.S. patents (Nos. 7,802,310; 6,415,280; and 7,949,662) related to generating content-based identifiers using algorithms like cryptographic hashes. The court invalidated the patents, deeming them ineligible for patenting.

Like the case of PersonalWeb, getting a patent on a blockchain technology is like getting a patent on algorithm, which is a patent-ineligible concept and fails the first step of Alice.  Therefore, the key here is to determine whether the claimed invention recites additional elements that would transform the claim into a practical application of the patent-ineligible concept and therefore survive the second step of Alice.

To navigate the complexities of patent eligibility, particularly under the second step of the Alice framework, it is essential to demonstrate how a claimed invention integrates additional elements that transform a potentially patent-ineligible concept into a practical application. For instance, when seeking patents for blockchain technology, it is crucial for practitioners to craft claims that highlight enhancements in computer functionality attributable to the blockchain. Given the increasing importance of the specification in Section 101 analysis, the specification must detail the improvements in computer functionality, such as enhanced processing speed, reduced data transmission over networks, and decreased power consumption.  The specification should underscore that the inventive concept tackles a challenge uniquely present in computer technology and provides a solution that is also technologically based.

The Future of Blockchain Patents

The competition for blockchain patents is has become increasingly fierce as businesses and inventors strive to establish their dominance in this innovative sector. Although there appears to be a decrease in the number of new patent applications, the persistent interest in blockchain over the last few years underscores its critical role in driving the next wave of digital innovation across multiple domains.

With its rapidly growing influence, blockchain technology promises to transform industries ranging from finance to logistics, making the acquisition of patents an essential strategy for entities looking to protect their breakthroughs while promoting continued progress. The varied group of top contenders, including both tech giants, banks and emerging players, signals a widening enthusiasm and investment in the capabilities offered by blockchain.

As efforts to accumulate blockchain patents persist, the crucial interplay between technological advancements and the protection of intellectual property is expected to significantly shape the future development of blockchain. This dynamic will likely have a profound impact on how blockchain is integrated into various sectors, potentially altering business models and industry norms.

Conclusion

The exploration of blockchain technology encompasses both challenges and opportunities at the crossroads of innovation and intellectual property. As developers and companies venture further into the realm of blockchain’s potential, the significance of safeguarding their innovations remains pivotal in this digital revolution. While patents offer a means to protect these innovations, navigating through the patent eligibility criteria established by the Supreme Court in the Alice case necessitates meticulous strategizing.

Subscribe to our Newsletter to stay updated on the latest patent news. Looking forward to connecting with you! 

About the Author

Babak Akhlaghi is an adjunct professor at University of Maryland, where he teaches legal aspects of entrepreneurship. Babak is also a registered patent attorney and the Managing Director at NovoTech Patent Firm, where he assists inventors in protecting and monetizing their inventions. He is also a co-author of the "Patent Applications Handbook," which has been updated and published annually by West Publications (Clark Boardman Division) since 1992. One of his distinguished accomplishments involves guiding a startup through the patent application process, which led to substantial licensing opportunities that significantly enhanced the company's strategic value.

×